This post may contain affiliate links, meaning I get a commission if you decide to make a purchase through my links, at no cost to you. The products that I advertise are the ones I believe in.
What do those less than 1% or 2% ‘DNA trace results’ or ‘low confidence regions’ mean when it comes to DNA and your genetic history? What are they anyway and what do they mean for Europeans carrying non-European genetic markers?
The answer is more akin to “fuzzy logic” rather than absolute truth. In fact, truth is in the eye of the beholder when it comes to trace regions and results! If you don’t believe me, then take a look at Family Tree DNA’s myOrigins disclaimer: “the weight you give to each thread is up to you.”
In all honesty, that’s why these things are called ethnicity ESTIMATES – they’re ESTIMATES. These estimates are either echoes of the distant past or fool’s gold, I’ll explain that in a bit. First, take a look at a disclaimer from Ancestry: “it’s possible you may not have genetic ethnicity from them at all.”
Also note that Ancestry uses RANGES to determine ethnicity estimates. I like this because in essence estimates can be considered mathematical ranges and their disclaimer seems to encapsulate this fact. The part that weirds me out is how wide the ranges are! Between zero and 15%?
An ethnicity estimate is really their margin of error, not yours: remember that.
This snippet from Ancestry gives a range of 30%, crikey. Although I really appreciate how forthcoming they are with how they treat their data, it’s still a bit alarming to realize that a spread of 30% in generational terms is greater than one grandparent! I applaud Ancestry for their transparency, though.
Reading this we can understand that the range of ethnicity percentages is a function of the range of TIME that your genome has been passed down over successive generations. The range of time used in the above snippet is in the THOUSANDS of years. I hope you are beginning to see why trace regions and DNA trace results are either echoes of the distant past or fool’s gold.
Actually, I think they’re echoes of the distant past AND fool’s gold, personally.
If you are of European descent and find that you are showing ~1% of Middle Eastern then don’t be alarmed, it’s neither an indictment or a confirmation. It’s an echo of Europe’s distant past. There are many Europeans who show this trace region, that’s because THOUSANDS of years ago that’s where Europeans actually originated from in the scope of historical migration and settlement – see map below.
Trace DNA or Low Confidence Regions are merely echoes of the past that are still hanging around in your DNA. For example, if you polled 1,000 former Boy Scouts in their 40s probably less than 5% of them would still have all of their merit badges, most have either discarded them or lost them over time. Genetic trace results, reflected in Ancestry’s Low Confidence Regions, are things ALL of our ancestors once had, but now only a few of us do.
This ancient origins map from Family Tree DNA shows percentages of the 3 major migrations into Europe as an example of someone who tested with them. The Hunter-Gatherers came first, then the Farmers, and then the Metal Heads! If you have more Hunter-Gatherer DNA then the more likely you are to have trace amounts of Middle Eastern DNA, because they are an older population. Make sense?
Neanderthals and other bipeds have been haunting our lands for millenia – actually, most people of European descent have Neanderthal DNA! Trace results of non-European DNA are basically remnants of our ancient past which reflect the places from where our super-ancient ancestors originated over 60,000 years ago.
Our aim in taking DNA tests is often to compartmentalize things in to nice, neat slices of expected or perceived reality. However, the past is so much more complex than history itself can even account for. Ancestry’s and FTDNA’s disclaimers give us license to take what we want and discard what we don’t want; however, the reality of DNA testing is that anomalies are the rule rather than the exception.
In reality, we should interpret our DNA results against the backdrop of actual and factual genealogical research. As Ancestry and other sites are continually updating how they process ethnicity percentages that we see as users, our interface is actually changing every few months – it’s more process than product. My Ancestry ethnicity estimates and low confidence regions have changed, shifted, and been recalculated several times since 2011, as have my results on FTDNA. Don’t let genetic trace results from low confidence regions be the fly in your soup!
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR FROM YOU – MAKE SURE YOU LEAVE A COMMENT BELOW
SIGN UP to stay up to date on the latest posts from the Family History Foundation.
After reading your post, you have a great website with interesting content. Keep up the quality work!
We endeavour do do our best here!
I originally had small amounts of Italy (11%) and Iberian Penninsula (5%). They disappeared with an update. At ancestry. But doing my family tree I found ancestors from both Italy and Spain. Soooo, why did they disappear??
I hate that! As Ancestry adds or refines their reference populations they update how your DNA corresponds to their reference panels. So, for example, if you shared common genetic markers with a reference panel from Italy that would show up as your 11% Italian (which of course has its own range of 0-35%!). If Ancestry then updated their reference panels, and even added additional ones, their DNA algorithms might now place you in a different non-Italian category. I’ve suffered through this many times, as I know my genealogy and my DNA should reflect that, but often does not in terms of trace results. Don’t get dismayed, it’s all just guesstimates, keep doing your genealogy as that’s the best way to really know who you are.
Thank you!