Home » Family » 4 Annoying Problems With Find A Grave’s New Website
4-annoying-problems-with-find-a-graves-new-website-angel-1822368_640

4 Annoying Problems With Find A Grave’s New Website

Affiliate Disclosure

This post may contain affiliate links, meaning I get a commission if you decide to make a purchase through my links, at no cost to you. The products that I advertise are the ones I believe in.

If it wasn’t for the fact that Find A Grave provides an unparalleled service to the genealogical community, their website’s design and functionality would be laughed right off the internet! After 3 months of tinkering with the new ‘purple monster’ here are 4 annoying problems with Find A Grave’s new website.

First, let’s start with the ad-heavy interface on Find A Grave. I get that they have to make money to run their website (I do too!) but ad placement is something that should not interfere with the smooth functioning of a reader’s experience while on that site. Too many adds placed in inconvenient locations can lead to what web heads call a “higher bounce rate,” which is people staying on your page for less amounts of time. That’s a problem.

The second critique of Find A Grave’s new website is that I have is that there are huge ads in the right-hand column between the pictures section and the flowers section, it’s kind of annoying as those 2 pieces compliment one another and should resemble an actual cemetery where the headstone is on top and the flowers below it. Solution: move the ad block below the flowers or thin it out so that it’s not as intrusive – in fact, that’s the solution for ALL of the ads on Find A Grave.

The other ad location that I have a problem with is the one at the end of the memorial which relegates the memorial owner/contributor (“created by”) to the bottom of the page below a huge, blocky ad just above the footer; this is an almost criminal formatting decision as this irrevocably disassociates the Find A Grave community from itself. “Anyone seen my noggin?”

3-annoying-problems-with-find-a-graves-new-website-statue-2467255_640
Source: Pixabay

Third, what’s up with the “read more” button?!? Straight up, I don’t like these. The whole purpose of Find A Grave, in my mind, is to feature memorials about our loved ones that have passed on and NOT to have a memorial description be placed prominently, front-and-center on the site is, well, kind of ass-backwards. Memorial space is being sacrificed for ad space. “Read more?” Yes, I want to read more! A full memorial description should be the default setting.

The last critique/problem/complaint/gripe of Find A Grave’s new website that I’ve heard from others and have experienced myself is missing information on memorials. Um, major faux pas! This is a minor frustration for me since I only manage 17 memorials; but what about the top contributors that have over 100,000 memorials to their name? I can only imagine their stress.

As someone who has helped many people start their own blogs, I can fully relate to the angst involved in the technical requirements of a relaunch, but this seems like a systemic problem that should have been planned around. I see this as core database issue which cannot simply be “fixed.”

I have only been a Find A Grave user since 2013 and am glad they took the time to bring their website into the 21st century as the old site was practical but super unwieldy with all sorts of scripting problems. I think I was too positive in my initial review of the new FaG site. I know they are working to create the best user experience possible and it takes time to de-bug any new website after it goes live.

However, the thing that sunk my boat, so to speak, was when I saw members on a FB genealogy page who were displaying Find A Grave screenshots to one other still using the OLD site! That’s when you know there are at least 4 annoying problems with Find A Grave’s new website, aka, the “purple monster.”

WE’D LOVE TO HEAR FROM YOU – MAKE SURE YOU LEAVE A COMMENT BELOW

Think You've Reached The End? Well, you haven't!*Register Today*

SIGN UP to stay up to date on the latest posts from the Family History Foundation.

30 Comments

  1. Sharon Stewart January 11, 2018
  2. Diane Gould Hall January 11, 2018
  3. Carol Ann Hilton January 11, 2018
  4. Sara Sommer January 12, 2018
  5. Kerry Bailey January 13, 2018
    • charli January 16, 2018
  6. Shana McNamara Cardenas January 13, 2018
  7. Aurorae Little January 13, 2018
  8. Karen Birk Weatherford January 13, 2018
  9. Robert Allard January 14, 2018
  10. Randy Dotson January 14, 2018
  11. Edna Hopper DeVries Zeyak January 14, 2018
  12. Karyn Buckner Garvin January 14, 2018
  13. Karyn Garvin January 14, 2018
  14. Jeni January 14, 2018
  15. Carol Osting Bentley January 14, 2018
  16. Robert S. January 14, 2018
  17. Ronnie January 14, 2018
  18. Sarah Lockwood Donahue January 15, 2018
  19. Chrissy Ragulsky January 15, 2018
  20. Jonathan Hill May 28, 2018
  21. Rodyna December 7, 2021

Have something to say about this article? The world is listening.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top